While it might not represent the end of the World Wide Web, what Google has indicated is that if your website is deemed “not mobile-friendly,” your listing could soon be relegated to the backwaters of the world’s most popular search engine. While this could be cause for many website owners to panic, they should take some comfort that when a major web portal tested the top 25,000 websites in the world, more than 10,000 of them failed, including the
Courtesy of Pixabay |
Bear in mind that at this juncture, Google’s tool assumes that HTML5 resizing of a web page is inadequate. HTML5 automatically resizes websites to fit any platform, including smartphones. However, in many cases, the print becomes small and links become too close for those of us with fat thumbs to use. Anyone with a smartphone can expand the page view by just moving their fingers on the screen to make the image bigger. And this does solve the problem to some extent. However, Google feels that this is not good or friendly enough. I tend to agree.
Case in point: When I put our http://workingthewebtowin.com site through Google's test, this is how it displayed our site on their simulated smartphone: This page is coded in HTML5 yet it doesn't fully scale to the smartphone formats. Granted, this is not one of our landing pages, which does scale (pages we hunt with) or our Blogger site, which also scales (because it's owned by Google). However, the test provides the feedback we need to correct this kind of problem.
This is how it should look when HTML5 scales properly to a smartphone. We're already looking to use Google webmaster tools to resolve the issue on our nexus site.
Of course, you can always resize the website on a tablet, Case in point: When I put our http://workingthewebtowin.com site through Google's test, this is how it displayed our site on their simulated smartphone: This page is coded in HTML5 yet it doesn't fully scale to the smartphone formats. Granted, this is not one of our landing pages, which does scale (pages we hunt with) or our Blogger site, which also scales (because it's owned by Google). However, the test provides the feedback we need to correct this kind of problem.
This is how it should look when HTML5 scales properly to a smartphone. We're already looking to use Google webmaster tools to resolve the issue on our nexus site.
To make the mystery even better, we also found that a couple of other company-owned websites built using identical HTML5 architecture came up as mobile-friendly on Google's testing page. So why the difference? It's possible there may be some code fragment missing that the Google
If your site is deemed search-engine-unfriendly, at least you’re in good company
Courtesy of Searchengineland |
Song Lyrics and Bloomberg Business. I suspect a bunch of people at Reddit are about to lose their minds over this. But the Reddit home page doesn’t
The home pages of NBC Sports and SongLyrics didn’t test
friendly either; I couldn’t even get Google’s mobile friendly
testing tool to process SongLyrics . Vogue’s home page did test as
friendly, but potentially it has problems with internal pages.”
http://searchengineland.com/winners-losers-google-mobilegeddon-219786
http://searchengineland.com/winners-losers-google-mobilegeddon-219786
Knowing this, I spent the next three hours manually entering
every one of the 173 websites we created and host for ourselves and our
clients. With the exception of the
workingthewebtowin.com website and seven client -owned sites we created before
the advent of HTML5, all our clients came up as mobile search-engine-friendly.
(I submitted a new XML sitemap for the workingthewebtowin.com site to see if
this doesn’t help the Google bots cure their myopia regarding our site.)
What’s it All About, Google?
So why is Google going out of its way to penalize a website
owner who has worked hard to get their website onto Page One? Why is Google in
such a big rush to push everyone to have a mobile-friendly website? I believe
the answer lies in Google’s need to expand its pay per click market, which is its
largest revenue stream. This has caused a relatively flat growth for a while now. Think
of it this way, Google likes to sell pay per click advertising to businesses
that want to be on Page One of Google search. I believe Google's pay per click
sales have been flat because the conversion rate for many who use AdWords is
down. Why? Many “regular” websites aren’t converting clicks to sales when
people use their smartphones to access the Internet. These websites have poor
conversion rates because they are not mobile-friendly. Again, this is speculation
on my part, but it makes sense, especially from Google’s perspective.
There are other factors in play as well that affect visitor
conversion (see our articles “ Making
Pay Per Click Pay Big Dividends,” and “Six
Things That Turn PPC Ads Into Advertising That Pays”), and these should not
be ignored. However, forcing companies to make their site more mobile-friendly
is a good move on Google's part. First, it will require a whole lot of new website
owners that need Page One position to succeed to start using AdWords again. Especially
if they fell off of Page One because of this change. And two, this algorithm
change should improve conversion rate for pay per click because mobile users
will be able to actually read the web pages they land on.
From Google’s perspective the answer is clear: Mobile is the
future of the Internet. Cellphone providers in the past five years have put a
web-capable smartphone in the hands of 75% of the citizens in this
country. (Nearly 80 million smartphone
users do their social networking on the device as well.) As the price of
smartphones continues to fall and desktop and laptops continue to shrink, will
there come a time when all computers are quasi-mobile?
The popularity of phablets is also another way in which the
lines between laptops, tablets and smartphones continues to blur. While phablets were merely smartphones on
steroids two years ago, as solid state memory chips continue to get more
powerful and ever-more affordable, we’re already starting to see phablets that
can do nearly everything that a laptop can do and sometimes more.
With the pick-a-size web surfing world, using a platform or code that can dynamically adapt your websites to whatever platform they might be viewed in doesn’t just make sense from a Google-centric perspective. It also makes sense from a visibility issue, since the secret to online success is to make it easy for people to do business with you, regardless of what platform they’re using to access your site. Today, that means different online strokes for different folks. If you aren’t ready, willing and able to allow people to view your sites on the platform of their choice, then Mobilegeddon will be the least of your worries.
In this article, I discussed the consequences and implications of Google's latest algorithm change that’s being called Mobilegeddon. I explored the current status of the World Wide Web where most websites are not prepared for Mobilegeddon or the mobile traffic that Google says it now emphasizes. I also provided a link to Google mobile compliance testing page and showed how Google’s test site doesn’t fully take into account HTML5, which dynamically resizes a page to fit the devices it is being displayed on.
Get your Free EBook |
If you’d like to read similar articles about Google updates,
check out: “Has Google Given Everyone the Bird with its Pigeon Update?,"
and "Hummingbird is Nothing to Hum About!," or just type
words "Google algorithm" in the search box at the top left of this
blog.
If you'd like a free copy of our eBook, "Internet Marketing Tips for the 21st Century," please fill in the form on the side bar and and receive instant access. Your information is always kept private and is never sold.
Carl Weiss is president of Working the Web to Win, an
award-winning digital marketing agency based in Jacksonville,
Florida. You can listen to
Carl live every Tuesday at 4 p.m. Eastern on BlogTalkRadio.
Related articles
Related articles
Your blog is amazing.
ReplyDeleteWow. Nice Article. You may also like Hike For PC
ReplyDelete